1. The Fundamental Theory of Finite Abelian Groups sounds important. Why do the people who write the textbooks always lay the groundwork out so that the proofs of the fundamental theorems is so anti-climactic? I can't say I followed Lemma 8.6, an "intricate" proof.
2. I'm swimming in deep water here. I knew Abstract Algebra would be a bit abstract, but I have no intuition with this kind of stuff.
No comments:
Post a Comment